The Problem:

Alternative Therapies are Excluded from Research

About Us

We are people with Parkinson’s dedicated to elevating the voices of those with lived experience of Parkinson’s to inform the way Parkinson’s is understood, treated, and ultimately cured.

What We Offer

Resolve Parkinson’s offers opportunities for you to contribute to a changed future. You can help us transform the future of Parkinson’s.

Despite their potential to improve patient outcomes, alternative therapies often go unstudied due to systemic biases in funding and research priorities. This exclusion not only hampers innovation but leaves patients to navigate alternative options without adequate guidance or evidence.

The Research Bias Against Alternative Therapies

One of the key barriers to studying alternative therapies to treat Parkinson’s is the profit-driven nature of pharmaceutical and academic institutions. Natural remedies, lifestyle interventions, and other non-patentable solutions are often overlooked because they cannot be monetized. Instead, research investments prioritize treatments with patent potential — those seen as “magic beans” that promise financial returns.

Pursuing Alternative Therapies Can Pose Risks to Patients

One of the key barriers to studying alternative therapies to treat Parkinson’s is the profit-driven nature of pharmaceutical and academic institutions. Natural remedies, lifestyle interventions, and other non-patentable solutions are often overlooked because they cannot be monetized. Instead, research investments prioritize treatments with patent potential — those seen as “magic beans” that promise financial returns.

As a result, small studies on alternative therapies — often initiated by independent researchers — are either underfunded or dismissed as unconvincing. This research gap harms Parkinson’s patients by limiting access to potentially transformative solutions.

Facing limited and ineffective therapeutic treatments from mainstream healthcare providers, Parkinson's patients frequently turn to alternative therapies out of frustration and desperation.

Facing limited, and ineffective therapeutic treatments from mainstream healthcare providers, Parkinson’s, patients frequently turn to alternative therapies out of frustration and desperation. From supplements and herbal remedies to stringent diets and DIY medical devices, patients explore untested solutions in hopes of relief.

However, these pursuits are not without risks:

  • Supplement Interactions: Patients combine natural supplements with prescription medications, sometimes with adverse effects.
  • Unsupervised Diets: Stringent diets can lead to malnutrition and unintended health consequences.
  • Unregulated Therapies: DIY use of light therapy, vibration devices, or unproven remedies may provide benefit but also risk harm.


Without robust research, patients and caregivers must navigate these options based on anecdotal evidence shared in online forums or support groups, increasing their vulnerability.

The Financial Burden of Alternative Care

Alternative therapies are often unaffordable for many patients. Out-of-pocket costs for supplements, alternative treatments and therapies like exercise or mindfulness programs compound the financial strain of traditional healthcare costs.

Patients with limited means face stark disparities:

  • Lack of access to proven non-pharmaceutical interventions like physical therapy or mental health services
  • Inability to explore potentially beneficial lifestyle changes or therapies due to financial constraints.

Reluctant Healthcare Professionals Leave Patients on Their Own

Most neurologists and allied healthcare providers are hesitant to recommend alternative therapies, citing insufficient evidence. Without FDA approval or substantial scientific backing, discussing such treatments can pose legal and professional risks for healthcare providers.

This leaves patients unsupported in exploring options they find beneficial, creating a disconnect between patient needs and professional guidance.

Steps Towards a Solution

Resolve Parkinson’s envisions a more inclusive future for research into alternative therapies that can be realized by implementing these strategies:

By addressing these systemic gaps, we aim to transform Parkinson’s care, ensuring every patient has access to therapies that improve their quality of life — regardless of profitability. Together, we can challenge the status quo and advocate for a future where alternative therapies are valued, researched, and accessible. Learn more about our vision for the future and strategies to create system changes.

The Problems We See

The System of Care is Poorly Designed

The current system to assist people with Parkinson’s appears to have evolved without rational planning. Systemic issues include lack of patient access to Parkinson’s specific care, ineffective drug therapies, and a poorly socialized standard of care in health settings. This has led many patients to try to manage their care on their own.

The Definition of Parkinson’s is Too Narrow

Parkinson’s is a multisystemic syndrome rather than solely a movement disorder limited to brain neurology. A focus on non-motor symptoms is critical to understanding how Parkinson’s evolves and how early intervention may slow or halt the disease.

There is a Lack of Access to Quality Care

Most patients with Parkinson’s lack access to multidisciplinary teams of specialists including neurologists trained in Parkinson’s, movement disorder specialists, physical and occupational therapists, and mental health professionals. This team approach has proven to be the most effective model of care for Parkinson’s patients.

The Patient Voice is Being Ignored

Parkinson’s patients need to have a seat at the table throughout the clinical research process. Patient input into how resources are used is a critical missing element that will bring about change if broadly applied. Positioning the patient voice more powerfully will disrupt stagnation and drive change.

Research Targets Are Profit-Driven

The pharmaceutical industry ecosystem dictates where research funding is allocated. Patients with Parkinson’s need to be positioned as leaders in the fight to improve care and find a cure. Their voice needs to be a critical component of legislation and research targets.

Researchers Ask the Wrong Questions

There is a dearth of creative thinking in the Parkinson’s field. Research priorities need to shift to include the investigation of a broader range of hypotheses concerning Parkinson’s origin and progression. Out-of-the-box thinking can spur innovation that may lead to a breakthrough towards better treatment and a cure.
We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. By browsing this website, you agree to our use of cookies.